U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
Other State Department Archive SitesU.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
U.S. Department of State
Home Issues & Press Travel & Business Countries Youth & Education Careers About State Video

Remarks After Six-Party Informal Ministerial

Secretary Condoleezza Rice
Shangri-la Hotel
July 23, 2008

SECRETARY RICE: Look, it was a good meeting, no surprises. It was just an informal opportunity. I think everybody essentially confirmed the September agreement, confirmed the October 2007 agreement, confirmed that we need to move ahead rapidly to finish phase two obligations; a lot of discussion of the verification protocol and the importance of the verification protocol; a call to have better bilateral relations among the various parties.

And I thought it was – you know, the atmosphere was actually very good. The Chinese did a really excellent job of running the meeting, and I think they are very focused on moving forward. And I think they would like to have a more formal ministerial at some point, but no one – we didn’t commit to a date for that, although we said we would.

QUESTION: Did you get a North Korean – what kind of assessment do you have of him and what he said?

SECRETARY RICE: It was not – nothing surprising. He talked about the importance of everybody meeting their obligations. It was a not a --

QUESTION: So he talked about the importance or you did?

SECRETARY RICE: About – of everybody meeting their obligations, but I don’t want to go, you know, into detail about what everybody said, just to say there weren’t any surprises. But it wasn’t – you know, it wasn’t a standoff with people just stating their positions. I think we had probably three or four rounds of comments. So, you know, the initial – very often, these things, the initial thing is people read a statement. But a couple of people didn’t and then there were several – it was interactive. It wasn’t just people making statements, which is good.

QUESTION: Did you get any kind of sense about what they think about the draft protocol?

SECRETARY RICE: No, but we --

QUESTION: It was just --

SECRETARY RICE: We didn’t. You know, it’s important that we get a response, that the parties, the Six Parties get a response. It was actually China, as the chair of the denuclearization working group.

QUESTION: Did they give any indication about when they might?


QUESTION: This seems to be – much like Iran, you know --

SECRETARY RICE: We didn’t get into specific timetables, but look – the spirit was good because people believe we’ve made progress. But there is also a sense of urgency about moving on, and a sense that this – we can’t afford to, sort of, have another hiatus of several months.


MR. MCCORMACK: Okay, guys.

QUESTION: Oh, one more thing.


QUESTION: Did you shake hands with the --


QUESTION: I didn’t see it.

SECRETARY RICE: With the North Korean --

QUESTION: With the North Korean, you shook hands with him? And --




QUESTION: And secondly, did you – you said beforehand that you were going to give a firm message that they had to meet their commitments and their obligations on all aspects of the nuclear program.

SECRETARY RICE: I – yes, I did, but so did others.

MR. MCCORMACK: All right, guys.



QUESTION: Thank you.


Released on July 23, 2008

  Back to top

U.S. Department of State
USA.govU.S. Department of StateUpdates  |   Frequent Questions  |   Contact Us  |   Email this Page  |   Subject Index  |   Search
The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs, manages this site as a portal for information from the U.S. State Department. External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.
About state.gov  |   Privacy Notice  |   FOIA  |   Copyright Information  |   Other U.S. Government Information

Published by the U.S. Department of State Website at http://www.state.gov maintained by the Bureau of Public Affairs.